womenontheirway.com |
This article
in Education Week brings the charter school initiative, I-1240 once again to
the front page of my thinking. I know
that, like football, this has been a recurring theme in previous posts, but it
is an education issue of significance and may be as some are beginning to
suggest the first step in a broader plan to change education in this state. Much in the article is a rehash of other
articles, but there are for me some new and interesting twists. First for me was this information from a
recent statewide poll asking if education issues favored one governor candidate
over another.
When Elway Research, a Seattle-based polling firm, asked state
residents whether education issues in the state gave Mr. Inslee or Mr. McKenna
a bigger advantage, 31 percent gave the edge to Mr. Inslee, while 30 percent
gave it to Mr. McKenna. The rest gave neither an advantage on the issue.
It appears that education issues may not be playing a significant
role in this critical election. The
charter initiative is certainly one of the main education issues where the
candidates hold different positions with McKenna firmly in the “Yes” camp and
Inslee in the “NO” camp. The poll would
suggest that the candidate's position on this issue is not resulting in a significant benefit for either of them.
A second new twist for me is the reference to Wisconsin Governor
Scott Walker that is beginning to emerge in the “No” campaign. As can be seen in the excerpt below, McKenna
is being likened to Walker and some see charters as the first step in a plan to
take on other education issues as Walker did once he was elected. Mr. Holmquist, quoted in the article, has
been a public school teacher for 25 years.
As for Mr. McKenna, who supports performance pay and abolishing
last-hired-first-fired labor rules, Mr. Holmquist saw parallels to another
Republican governor elected in 2010, and fears Mr. McKenna would move against
collective bargaining itself. "He's going to talk one way and behave
another way if he becomes governor, just like Scott Walker did in
Wisconsin."
The last piece of interesting information is the comparison between
how much money was raised in the “Yes” and “No” campaigns today and in 2004
when we last voted on it. There is far
more money today for the “Yes” group and far less money today for the “No”
group. Will this be the deciding factor
or are there other variables that will ultimately decide this issue? Are you ready to share your "guess" on the outcome?
Total contributions to the "Yes on
1240" campaign add up to $8.3 million, according to the National Institute
on Money in State Politics, a non-profit based in Helena, Mont. In fall 2004,
pro-charter donations totaled $3.8 million, the Seattle Times reported that year.
The two
anti-charter campaigns, meanwhile, have raised $275,000 between them, including
donations from the state teachers' union, an affiliate of the National
Education Association. That pales, however, in comparison with 2004, when $1.3
million had been raised by early October to fight charters.
2 comments:
I believe that this election will be close and I am afraid that this election may get bought. I do not have a prediction except that it will be close.
I predict that I-1240 will pass. There is a lot of money to be made off charter schools. I recommend reading this article (http://www.alternet.org/education/education-profiteering-wall-streets-next-big-thing). It is about the profits to be made on charter schools. Additionally, some funding seems to be coming from people who want a shortcut around the visa process (http://www.alternet.org/education/charter-schools-sold-investment-wealthy-foreigners-looking-green-card). Anyone want to bet?
Post a Comment